Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Schools and Holidays

"...no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities."
Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, Thomas Jefferson, 1779
I always enjoy the morality spats in this country: the squeals about flag burning and film content and gay marriage. At the epicenter of these is the fight about the separation of church and state. I love this one especially. For many years protestant Christians have used the government at all levels as an extension of the practice of their religion, and as that becomes less and less appropriate with a diverse society many of them are increasingly upset about the schools becoming more secular. They put forth all manner of entertaining reasons to object to this: that secularism is a competing religion unto itself, that the founding fathers intended our nation to be a theocracy (read the truth here), that the majority gets to do whatever it wants, and my favorite: that God in government ("In God we trust (1956)", "Under God (1954)") is just a "civic religion" and doesn't hold any real meaning and yet would be a death knell to civilization if removed.

Now as much as I would love to write an essay taking on the entire concept, I'm limiting myself here to a brief discussion of the practical aspects because in reality these disagreements don't add up to much when it comes to real issues facing educators and students every day. They are an electoral distraction more than anything else.

Take a moment to consider the degree to which Christianity dominates our educational environment.
  1. We are currently taking time off from school for "Winter Break." We call it Winter Break, but everybody can plainly see that it is "Christmas Break." Imagine if I were to propose that we have "Winter Break" around Hanukkah, just a couple of weeks earlier.
  2. In April we will have "Spring Break," which is of course always adjacent to Easter weekend. Try moving it to center on Passover just a couple of weeks later.
  3. Every student pledges allegiance to "one nation, under God" every morning
  4. Since 2002, every school in Virginia must prominently display the motto "In God We Trust." This seems generic enough until you consider that not all of our students are religious, some who are are not monotheistic, and even some monotheistic religions have prohibitions about the depiction of the name of God.
  5. Many official events that I have been to, typically department lunches and dinners, are initiated by a Christian prayer led by one of the people in the room who supervises all the others on the job.
  6. The Board of Supervisors swearing-in ceremony this past Saturday was started with a benediction "in the name of Jesus Christ."
With that I hope that we've dispensed with the illusion that God has been eradicated from the public schools. The fact is that religion is a very strong, diverse and healthy part of our society and the public schools are no different from any other facet of life in that regard. Public schools should be a place where children can learn about different religions and profess their own. At the same time public schools must never promote one religion over another, or religion itself.

To help School Board members, Superintendents and educators with this balancing act, there are a number of helpful publications.
This past week I received another, Guidelines on Religion in Public Schools, published by the Jewish Community Relations Council. It includes a very helpful calendar of religious, national and community holidays for the upcoming school year. It is remarkable to view, because there is a holiday nearly every week of the year, and some weeks have multiples.

When you hear someone bemoan the assault on Christianity in public schools, you're hearing the wailing of a privileged class as its presumed birthright to power is revoked. To wit, see a couple of recent posts by fellow Loudoun blogger Barbara Curtis, whose "Mommy Life" blog is very well read both locally and nationally. Her recent post "Public schools and religious freedom: Can one person make a difference?" is a case in point.
I am hearing from parent after parent and teacher after teacher that all it took was one parent complaining for a school principal to completely cave and put the kibosh on Christmas or Christmas music - even while allowing every other religious holiday (and Kwanzaa is not a religious holiday, btw, just something thrown into the mix to level the playing field) under the sun to be celebrated. We can have a picture of a Menorah but not of a Nativity.
I've heard these stories before. One parent complains and suddenly... no Santa! Non-Christian religions have the run of the place! So far each of them has turned out to be a trumped-up charge, third hand at best. But the underlying spirit of this post, insulting Kwanzaa specifically and any faith that isn't her own with her broad generalization of "every other religious holiday," is what really bothers me. Really Barbara? Did your school commemorate Diwali or Ramadan this year? Did they celebrate Wesak, which is the birthday of Buddha? Or the birthdays of Baha'ullah (Baha'i) or Guru Nana Dev (Sihk)?

To her credit, in a different post, called "Christmas shut out at Waterford Elementary School?" Barbara comes up with a sort-of first-hand account:

I have not seen anything about Christmas. And I’m not talking about candy canes and trees. I’m talking about something representing the true basis for the Christian holiday celebrated by a much larger percentage of the population than these other holidays.

We sat silently through the huge hoopla that is Halloween at Waterford School, even though that is a religious holiday we do not celebrate ourselves.

Is Christianity to be shut out of my son’s school completely? If so, this is religious bias and it is illegal.

This is from the text of a letter that Barbara sent to her son's principal, and I appreciate that she did take it up with the principal directly in addition to posting it publicly. If you have an issue with something at your child's school, that is definitely the right thing to do. Too many parents spread their complaint to everybody except the principal.

Nonetheless, I can't find any merit to Barbara's complaint. First, she talks about the "true basis" for Christmas. I wonder if Barbara feels that her child's public school teacher is a qualified religious instructor. Then she mentions that hers is the majority religion... all the more reason to understand that kids of every faith are already awash in Christmas, have ample opportunity to learn about it outside of school, and that the powerful majority should be extra careful of its influence.

In the next sentence she calls Halloween a religious holiday. This is bunk. The connection Barbara would try to make is to Samhain, an ancient Celtic harvest holiday roughly equivalent to Thanksgiving here in the US. Samhain is celebrated on October 31st by some earth-centered religious faiths, and as my pagan friends will attest it has nothing to do with Halloween, certainly not the power-rangers and candy corn variety of public schools.

In Barbara's mind, all of life is a battleground for the dominance of the one true religion. Whenever she's not winning, she's losing. But this nation and the proud Commonwealth of Virginia were founded in part on the principal that government cannot, should not, must not be the arbiter of faith. Where government and religion intertwine there is trouble. Where people of every faith and of no faith are free to do as they please, nobody loses. People of faith must be involved in government, but the government must be built and executed on their values and not their religion.

I opened with Thomas Jefferson's Statute for Religious Freedom, I will close the same way:
Whereas Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the Holy author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as it was in his Almighty power to do; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavouring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time.
Merry Christmas.

14 Comments:

Anonymous said...

You forgot the daily minute of silence.

John Stevens said...

I purposefully didn't mention the minute of silence. I know that it was pushed by people who were trying to get as close as possible to a minute of prayer, but in my judgment it passes constitutional muster as a non-theistic practice and I don't have any objection to it.

Anonymous said...

We should have several hours of silence to contemplate the state of the world and its divisive issues (perhaps with some guided self-study to keep wandering minds occupied).

Gen said...

I am so glad that Barbara pointed us towards your blog on her blog. It is really refreshing to see your reasoned response to her critique. I loved your examples and agree with you fully on this.

As an atheist, I really don't get why Christians seem to enjoy acting like marginalized victims when I have to acknowledge their god and their holidays and their viewpoint wherever I go.

Thanks for the clear-headed rebuttal. Barbara didn't seem to get the same things from it that I did, but I appreciated it all the same.

Elise's Avonym said...

Wow - some good ol' debating going on here...after poking around Mainstream Loudoun's site a bit (after reading Barbara's response), an interesting find - they said all schools were provided a poster (back in 2002?) with the original motto "E pluribus unum" on it (looks like a nice poster): I wonder if any of those were ever accepted and posted?

Ratgrl said...

While I agree with you -- and Thomas Jefferson -- in principle and spirit, you need to realize that Halloween is All Hallows Eve, precursor to All Saints Day. It does have a Christian origin.

Anonymous said...

Christmas has secular origins, which most Christians (and I was raised one though am now "un-churched") refuse to acknowledge. The church co-opted the pre-Christian winter solstice to a) tamp down the festivities which were getting out of hand and b) convert more people.

Even many biblical scholars admit that no one is really sure when Christ was born but that December 25 probably wasn't the date.

My husband and I were both raised Christians but no longer attend church. We do realize that our son needs some understanding of Christianity since it is so prevalent in our society. But honestly, when you try to explain Christmas and Easter from a neutral standpoint, it's really hard to come up with an explanation that connects religion with the way we actually celebrate these holidays (Easter bunnies? Chocolate?) and still makes any sense.

Anonymous said...

John, Barbara's claims do have merit.I was directly involved with this case and contacted Ned Waterhouse, our deputy superintendent along with the attorney for Loudoun schools. You see our sons wanted to do a craft which had to do with the Christmas holiday, which we celebrate as the birth of Christ and they were told no. However, a mennorah craft was allowed, which by the way was fine with me. A parent was allowed to come in and discuss his Muslim faith last year along with a Jewish man and his faith. I have absolutely no problem with this, but when my child wants to express his faith he was told no. After the principal spoke with the attorney and was assured that this was leagl he was allowed to share. WE should not discriminate against Christians either and because we are so afraid of special interest groups who have been so outspoken our rights as individuals to express our faith as Christians has been taken in public schools whether you beleive it or not. It frightens me that you are the representative for the school board where we lived for 14 years in Cascades and still have friends who are affected by your decisions and opinions.

Anonymous said...

I don't think Barbara was insulting Kwanzaa, she was only saying it isn't a religous holiday. And she's right.
http://www.history.com/minisites/kwanzaa

Anonymous said...

Well, I would say that all Virginia K-12 students have to put up with and be subjected to PLENTY of stuff any one of them does not believe in. The cult of multiculturalism, for one. What a mess that has made our public education system. Kwanzaa is a disaster, started by a criminal back in the 1960s. There is much to expand here. John, please keep going. Lots of issues and beliefs get a pass from this type of scrutiny, because nobody bothers to call them "religions." They are.

Anonymous said...

Stevens said: "Every student pledges allegiance to "one nation, under God" every morning"

Why don't you change the curriculum so that the pledge is done in an assembly room as an optional exercise so EVERY KID doesn't have to participate.

David Weintraub said...

When you hear someone bemoan the assault on Christianity in public schools, you're hearing the wailing of a privileged class as its presumed birthright to power is revoked.

This is absolutely perfect. Great post, John.

Unfortunately, people who have always enjoyed special rights often do see that circumstance as a birthright, and honestly see the equal consideration of others as "special rights." It's nearly impossible to have empathy for people who think their majority-privileged status is a birthright, but you've explained the situation about as clearly as anyone could have.

It could be that the particular case Barbara talks about does have merit; there have been many cases in which school personnel err on the side of too much restriction out of fear (witness the prejudice-based nonsense over school plays created by activists two years ago).

It's not always clear where the line is, which is why the links you've provided are so helpful. I don't think there's a problem with allowing a child to express religious views in a project, if that's really all that happened. That's not the same thing as endorsement of religion by the school. Overreacting to things like that only gives ammunition to activists whose objective is to keep alive a fictional "war on Christmas" for political reasons. One mistake by an overly cautious teacher then gets embellished into a full-blown conspiracy, and a single case with merit is buried in an avalanche of deliberately instigated ones with no merit. It's probably not reasonable to expect most people to be able to see through this and know the difference.

Btw - is there a Nativity scene on our Courthouse lawn, or did I hallucinate that?

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but as a Christian I believe I have as much right to express my views as the next person, and I do enjoy hearing the views of the next person. I do not expect everyone to believe what I do but I would hope with freedom of speech and religion. The students say the pledge of alliegence to help them show pride for the nation, and the historic background of our nation is that our forefathers built the nation "under one god" and that was important to them. This is historic and history, doesn't mean that everyone has to believe in the one god, but I hope that as they sit in our classrooms they are one nation and proud of it. Several times 'spring break' has not coincided with Easter and the result of that was absenses, which is why the school returned to the old way. If you don't believe me look up 20yrs of Loudoun County's spring break history. As far as winter break being at Christmas, well, Christmas happens to be a week before the New Year, so isn't that conveinent. Also I worked with all Muslim's last Christmas, and I bit my tongue because I assumed (because of what public school tells us) they would be offended by my wishing them Merry Christmas, but the truth is they celebrated more lavishly then I did. Infact I was stuck working because they all wanted the day to spend with thier family. Christmas is a commercial holiday, celebrated by almost all religions, no just christmas. As far as the Nativity on the court house lawn, yes it's thier, it is historic. I realize that the country is more diverse but should those thing of tradition be ignored because of new ones? When we started celebrating Martin Luther King Jr's Birthday should we have stopped celebrating George Washington's because Washington owned slaved and he might be offensive. No one is forcing anyone to worship or believe in those things about our nation that reflect God. But historically, the men that formed our country said it was under one God, because they all believed in that one God. Is it really right to take those words out, or stop teaching why they are there? Please add new traditions, teach about Muslim religion, Budism, Judism, Athism, Wiccan, teach that this country is full of different people and different beliefs and each and everyone is to be respected. Teach that early settlers came to the America's so that they did not have to worship in hiding, so that they could have thier own beliefs and then encourage the students to believe openly, whatever they believe in. I grew up in a changing Loudoun County public school, I was once told school was an inappropriate place to read my bible, and from now on to leave it at home, that was 10 years ago. I was forcing no one to read it with me, I was reading on my own in study hall, I did argue and never brought it back. As long as my belief does not infringe on the right of another, then there should be no problem. Respect all religion equally and make everyone feel special for having thier own beliefs.

Anonymous said...

I find it disturbing that wikipedia was used at the basic background research for this blog. If I felt like it, I could go and add or take away to any part of wikipedia. I could add words in the middle of Jefferson's quotes. Wikipedia is not a grounded source of information, although it does have many interesting facts double check them serveral places before counting them as fact. If you don't believe me, just go try and edit it yourself, you can create a whole new history.

blogger templates