Thursday, October 20, 2011

Clarity about Clarity: Why 4s are not As

My favorite new blog is Mama's Turn Now, by a mom named Sharon whose son has Aspergers. This morning she wrote with frustration about a new assessment scale being used at LCPS that has other parents (and some teachers, I think ) confused as well.
In an effort to go towards an entirely web-based educational management system (Or for those folks, like me, who do not speak school board jargon… viewing your kids grades online) my county has instituted a new report card and grading system. My children’s daily work will be marked with a numerical score from one to four. This four point scale is built around a learning target which is identified as Level 3. Here is how it will translate on their report cards:

4 = Exceeds Standard or an A
3 = Meets Standard or a B
2 = Progressing Toward Standards or C
1 = Below Standard or D maybe F… not sure here as it is not really clarified in any of the literature.
I'm glad that Sharon blogged about this, giving me the opportunity to reblog it.

Before I begin: Disclaimers: I am not an educator, these changes were implemented by professional educators, and ultimately it should be your principal who is best able to explain things to you as a parent. As a parent who has spent a lot of time looking at this, I'm just offering the following to be helpful to my fellow parents.

So, #1: the new online grade book (Clarity) is not the source of this change. From Sharon Ackerman, Assistant Superintendent for Instruction:
Clarity is a curriculum management system that is a repository for lesson plans and tested resources for teachers to share.  It includes an automated teacher grade book similar to the one in use by secondary school teachers for the last several years.  Clarity is technological tool which stores the ratings from formative and summative assessments, but Clarity is not the reason for the focus on assessment and grading.  Clarity will allow us to open the "Parent Portal" next year so that parents may see assignments, formative assessment numbers,  and letter grades.
The new assessment systems are being implemented at the same time as Clarity, and Clarity will help track those assessments, but it's the assessment driving the technology, not the other way around. That's important.

Okay, now to the 4s and the As. The new 1-4 scale measures how the student is coming along toward the goal while they're still learning. Kids aren't supposed to be at a 3 or 4 level when a subject is first introduced. If they were, the teacher could skip that subject altogether. The "2" isn't a "C" as in "you didn't do so well, but you got by." It just means "not there yet, but we'll keep going." Assessing what the kids already know while they're about to begin, or what they've learned so far while they're still learning, is called (in "school board jargon") a "formative assessment."

These help the teacher to know whether to spend more time on a given topic before moving on. In Ms. Ackerman's words, " "Formative assessment is ongoing and guides the teacher's instructional plans. Teachers have always devised codes or systems for monitoring student progress on a daily or weekly basis.  These teacher notes assisted the teacher in pacing lessons and planning content." In my words, this isn't so new because it's one reason that teachers have always given quizzes and collected homework during a unit that leads up to a test.

So, while the 1-4 scale means "how are you coming along?" the traditional "A,B,C,D,F" scale is still used for tests and quizzes and reports and the like. It means "We're done, how well did you do?"

From Mrs. Ackerman: "Summative assessment is the more familiar "test" after the teacher feels that students have mastered the content. Report card grades are drawn primarily from the summative assessments (tests, projects, etc.) which will be rated with a traditional letter grade."

Simplifying more: "1-4" means "we're still working on this." "A-F" means "we're done."

In other words, a student at the "3" level (meets standard) should be able to achieve an "A" on a test.


Finally, I'll include some text  from from the LCPS web page:
Formative assessments are assessment for learning.  These are learning targets that are assessed by the teacher and rated on a 4 point scale.  This growth is communicated to parents and students alike through frequent feedback.  Formative assessment may include frequent classroom checks, class work, short quizzes, etc.
The scale for formative assessments is as follows:
4=Exceeds the requirements, 3=Meets the requirement, 2=Showing progress, 1=-No evidence yet
Summative assessments are assessments of learning and demonstrate mastery of the material.  These are learning targets that are assessed on LCPS grading scale and are also communicated to both parents and students.  This includes tests, projects, performances, etc.  As teachers begin the year, they will work with students to further explore opportunities to show mastery to include reteaching/retesting opportunities.

I hope that explanation helps.

You can read more in the LCPS Report Card Manuals.

10 comments:

  1. John thanks for the clarification about CLARITY. I am all for this. I think putting grades online is wonderful.

    I also get the whole meaning and thinking behind the 1-4 system. But I still have some problems with it.

    One I was told that in reference to reading, once a child shows that he/she has met the standard they are no longer assessed.That doesn't seem right to me.

    Second, my problem is in the fact that with this new system we are expecting our kids in Elementary schools to be exhibiting critical thinking skills in order to prove that they exceed the standards. Critical thinking is not something that comes naturally, it must be taught. It also has been proven that children in elementary school do not have the cognitive ability to do this yet even if they were taught. The end result... and I am seeing it already, children whose self esteem are suffering and who once liked school are now frustrated and upset by it. "Why should I bother... I can't get an A anyway is the attitude I am seeing. When I brought this up with my school's principle the response I got was that perhaps too much emphasis was being placed at home on grades. I found this ironic coming from school administration, especially since schools place so much value on the SOL's. If we are moving towards a critical thinking way of teaching... fine... then take away SOLs so the teachers have time to really teach!

    But this is my two cents!
    Would love to hear your take on this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sharon~
    Briefly, based on my perspective as a parent intensely involved in education but not an educator, and not in response to anything that an individual principal or teacher may have said:

    Assessment (and learning!) should absolutely continue after a child has met the standard.

    I don't see anything in the 1-4 assessment scale materials or the elementary report card manuals that mentions critical thinking.

    State law requires SOLs, and schools are judged on their SOL scores by the same community that laments their existence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When it comes to reading, in my experience, Sharon is correct. Kids are not assessed beyond their current grade level. So, for example, third graders all finish the year "reading at a third grade level" even though quite a few of them clearly are reading beyond that level. At least that is the case at my son's school.

    And I understand that continuing the test to see whether a kid is reading at the next grade level or beyond takes up time and the teachers have 25-plus kids to assess. But if you want kids to exceed standards, it would be useful to know how far beyond those standards they end up going.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for linking to the manuals. I read the grade 3-5 manual and was able to take away a much better understanding of CLARITY. I could not find critical thinking either. It might be better to have LCPS Admin Staff take CLARITY on the road to each cluster and introduce and explain it to the staff rather than depending on the building administrator. The information becomes vulnerable as it is filtered down through the building administrator to the educators in the classrooms and, finally, to the parents.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for posting this! A lot of parents at our school have questions about how Clarity works and the differences between formative and summative assessment, and I think you've done a good job of explaining it here.

    I teach an ungraded class and use Clarity for attendance only, but I've been using formative assessments for years and am very happy to see a mechanism for them in our software!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Christine Windle, Banneker ES ParentOctober 21, 2011 at 2:12 PM

    Detailed information on this new grading system is scarce so I feel fortunate to have found this blog. I encourage LCPS to conduct a "Clarity" road show to the elementary schools in an effort to educate and raise awareness on the new system.

    As part of the outreach, the following information would be helpful in further understanding the new grading method:

    -History of the LPS grading method;
    -Loudoun County School Board and Administration rationale for implementation;
    -Difference between assessments used in the standard versus LPS grading method;
    -Examples of assessments and curriculum to match the LPS grading method; and,
    -Materials to help students and parents better understand the new growth model

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Christine Windle
    Bannker ES Parent

    ReplyDelete
  7. "these changes were implemented by professional educators"

    This decision was NOT made by teachers. Also, not all schools have implemented the 1-4 grading system.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm sure there are a number of confused readers who are parents of high and middle school students going, "Huh?"

    Someone should clarify for them that the information on this page is pertinent to only elementary schools, and not the high schools and middle schools using Clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  9. John, if you could take a few minutes away from your campaigning and explain how clrity works in the high schools, some of us would like to know.

    ReplyDelete